ference to your application for correction of your
pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
section 1552. The application was filed in a timely
7
naval record
tates Code,
manner.
RK three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 19 November 2014. The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your
allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance
with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all
material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and
applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.
hiter careful and c nscientious consideratior BE £
record, the Board found the evidence submitcec was
to establish the existence of probable material er
injustice
You accepted an appointment as a Midshipman at the U.S. Naval
Academy on 30 June 2011. Based on the information current Ly
contained in your record it appears that you were subsequently
involuntarily processed for separation by reason of failure to
complete a course of instruction. In connection with this
processing, you would have acknowledged the separation action and
the separation authority would have approved a recommendation for
separation. The record clearly shows that on 21 June 2013, you
were discharged with an honorable characterization of service.
at that time you were assigned an RE-3K reentry code. In this
regard, you were assigned the most favorable reenlistment code
based on your circumstances. The RE-3K reenlistment code may not
prohibit reenlistment, but requires that a waiver be obtained
from recruiting personnel who are responsible for r iewi I
feasibility of satisfying the Navy's personnel Manning goals by
@
V7
determining whether or not an individual meets the standards for
reenlistment. If you wish to reenlist, re-affiliate, or be
reinstated in the Navy, you should contact the Navy Recruiting
Command via your nearest recruiting facility.
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your desire to be reinstated in the U.S. Naval Academy and
assertions that inaccurate information was submitted to the
academic board and that you were wrongly accused of committing an
honor offense. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors
were not sufficient to warrant relief in your case primarily due
to the: fact you provided no credible evidence to support your
assertions. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence within one year from the date of the Board’s decision.
New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board
prior to making its decision in your case. In this regard, it is
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity
attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying
for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on
the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Fxecutive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04231-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 January 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0530 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2014. Subsequently, on 11 June 2012, you were discharged with an honorable characterization of service discharge and assigned an RE-3K (disenrolled from Naval Academy or other officer program) reentry code. *consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1093 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 July 2014. The Board noted that applicable regulations provide that an RE-3K reentry code is the most favorable code that may be assigned to individuals who are separated by reason of being disenrolled from a commissioning program. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5656 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 June 2015. Finally, with regard to your assertions, the Board noted that your NUP was appropriately documented in your official military personnel file in accordance with applicable regulations and there is no error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08445-10
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, the Board concluded that you were correctly assigned the RE-3K reentry code due to your request to be disenrolled from OCS.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07705-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable Statutes, regulations, and policies. At this time you were not recommended for retention or reenlistment, and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in the reenlistment code because of your failure to complete basic training due to your lack...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2422 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 March 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the ‘burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6976 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 June 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12763-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, you were assigned the most favorable reenlistment code based on your circumstances. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00084-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 October 2010. In this regard, you were assigned the most favorable reenlistment code based on your circumstances. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.